I have been thinking a lot about
the idea of membership lately. I’m
reminded of American Express’ slogan, “Membership has its privileges.” That really works well for a service
organization and company like AMEX, but how does that translate to others
areas? In so many ways, our
consumeristic society has caused us to view everything as ours for a
price. We come to the conclusion that everything
can be bought, and if it can’t, it must not be worth our while.
When I think of membership, I
think of country clubs or pool and racquet clubs where a monthly or yearly fee
is paid and amenities are enjoyed. There
is very little that needs to be done outside of paying your dues. Annual meetings may be held, but there may be
no membership requirement to actually attend as there is a board of directors
which makes decisions on behalf of the membership. In fact, it’s possible that dues may be paid
and one might never even enjoy the benefits and amenities of the club or
organization short of simply being able to announce to friends and strangers at
parties that, “I’m a member of that club.”
When we enter into a member
relationship with the idea that the club or organization that we are joining
simply exists to serve us and meet our needs, there is no real relationship,
and if it is a relationships, it’s an unhealthy one at best. Healthy relationships are two-sided, they
involve both parties giving and taking alike.
The moment that they become one-sided is the moment that they have
ventured into unhealthy waters.
Arguments ensue, feelings are hurt, relationships are dissolved.
In many ways, the idea of
membership has connoted the benefits received through membership rather than
what is being offered in exchange for the privilege of membership. Not to be cliché or beat a dead horse, but
JFK’s famous quote of, “Ask not what your country can do for you, but what you
can do for your country” seems somewhat relevant in the face of any
organization, club, or country.
The idea of membership seems to
have been distorted in the church.
Having grown up within the church, the phrase, “I’ve been a member for
(fill-in-the-blank) years…” is never followed by anything positive. In fact, most of the times that I have heard
that phrase, it is generally just an excuse to domineer one’s opinion over
others and create some amount of credibility among people that your voice
should be heard. I hold to the same
ideology with membership that I do with experience, just as one should never confuse
1 year of experience repeated 40 times for 40 years of experience, neither
should one confuse 40 years of membership to being as meaningful as it might
sound.
I met with another local pastor a
few weeks back and we talked about the church plant that he has been leading
over the last few years. We stumbled
upon the topic of membership and he mentioned that they don’t have membership
classes but that they have partnership classes.
I stopped to think and realized that the term was much more agreeable to
me than membership. The idea of partnership
means commitment, means unity, means joining together for a common goal. Partnership means that decisions that are
made take into account the others who are impacted by those decisions. Partnership also conveys the idea of
ownership, in a good way.
Not too long ago, I read a book
by Joshua Harris entitled Stop Dating the
church: Fall in Love with the Family of God. It’s a fairly quick read that gives some good
insight into the importance of being a part of a local church body. While I don’t agree with everything that Harris
says, any objections are insignificant compared to the beneficial wisdom that
he imparts regarding communities of faith.
Whether you’re part of a club, a
church, or any other organization, what’s your view of membership? Do you look at these things as simply means
to serve you and your family, or do you see yourself in partnership with
others, seeking the well-being and furthering of the mission of the
organization, club, or church that you are a part of?
I have begun to appreciate more
and more the importance of a partnership and ownership mentality towards my
church, if you’re not at that place, ask yourself how much you’ve given and how
it compares to how much you’ve received.
While I don’t think that relationships should be checked by balance
sheets, I do think it’s important to consider that they be two-sided. Two-sided relationships are the only healthy
kinds of relationships that exist, what kinds of relationships are you looking
for?
I couldn't agree with you more that years of church membership is not a statistically valid way of measuring anything of importance in the kingdom. It certainly is not listed among the fruit of the spirit. It does not denote a commitment to take up your cross daily. I like the idea of partnership of individuals and church entities working together to 'fearlessly make known the mystery that is the gospel for which (we are all) ambassadors in chains.'
ReplyDeleteI see it as similar to marriage v. living together. It seems that married folks are more reluctant to dissolve the union and work harder at making it work than folks who are living together. So is there a tangible benefit? Maybe not. But...
ReplyDelete