After my last post on membership,
a friend brought up some questions that really got me thinking more about the
idea of membership. So, I wanted to address
some of her questions from my standpoint. I know that I won't answer them exactly, so I
won't necessarily list the questions out.
The questions dealt with where church membership requirements
come from, were they created by man or by God?
The questions also addressed the participation in church activities for
those who are not members of that specific body.
Becoming
a member of a church with a simple piece of paper attesting to it is
certainly man's requirement. It's
something that we have created to give a more clear sign and symbol of what we
see in Scripture. The God of Abraham,
Isaac, and Jacob is the God of covenants, He has made and makes promises with
covenants.
I do
not have space in this post to go into a long and detailed explanation of
covenants, but an overview is essential.
If we look throughout the Old Testament, we see the covenants that God
made with His people. He promised them
that He would watch over them and care for them, that He would set them apart
from other nations. To Abraham He
promised that all peoples would be blessed through him.
Some
of the covenants that God made with His people were one-sided, there was
nothing required from them. But there
were other covenants that were made that were mutual, covenants that were
conditional, under which the covenant would be voided should the terms not be
followed. Whenever covenants were
entered into between people and God or people and each other, there was
generally a blood requirement, blood needed to be shed in order that the
covenant would be signed and sealed.
Covenants
seem to be an antiquated idea in our society, we don't hear of them often. We talk of contracts and agreements, but just
the mere sound of those words makes it seem a bit formal with no relational
aspect to them at all. Covenants were
things that were to be taken seriously and when we continue to enter into
covenants, we should take them as seriously as they were in Old Testament
times.
I say
all this because, while the requirement of church membership is man-made, this
requirement ties into the idea of the biblical covenant, entering into an
agreement between us and God. We join
with Christ to be a part of his work on the earth, agreeing to be in
partnership with Him, through the power of the Holy Spirit. With this, there is an accountability
required, which is why churches have established membership. We enter into covenant with God and each
other in order that we can keep each other accountable, to hold each other to
what we are called to as members of the body of Christ. Paul speaks of this in 1 Corinthians and
Ephesians, the idea of a body with many members.
When
we are baptized, whether as infants or as adults, we enter into a covenant with
God. Infant baptism is a sign and symbol
of the fact that we are set apart, called by God, not in and of ourselves, but
before we have done anything. Adult
baptism is a public profession of faith, acknowledging that we have been called
by God to be a part of His family. We
enter into the family of God and just like our earthly families, we might not
have contracts or membership forms, we know that there are still requirements
of us to be a part of our family.
Herein
lies the difficulty: how do we become members of an organization, a club, or a
church without having some kind of membership requirements? Like any relationship, we expect it to be
two-sided. If we were to join a club and
feel that we were not getting the benefits of membership, we might either quit
the club or simply stay a part of it for status sake. But church should not be like this, we join not
so that we can tell people that we are a part of it, but so that we can have a
group of people who walk with us, holding us accountable to our covenant and
commitment, encouraging us, praying for us, teaching us, and learning from us
as we journey through life.
At
the same time, if a church does not feel that members are holding to the
requirements that they are called to uphold as members, what do they do? Many churches differ. Some remove members who no longer contribute or attend from
their rolls. Other churches allow
members to stay on their rolls regardless of their status, giving an unclear
picture of the make-up of a church.
While this may be a denominational thing, it is also fairly diverse on a
church by church basis. While I believe
that each body needs to determine what works best for them, it seems fairly
insincere to beef up membership rolls with people who don't positively contribute
to the overall health and advancement of the body of Christ.
The idea of membership as it
pertains to participation in certain church activities, most likely things such
as the sacraments, is a different questions.
Are we united through Jesus Christ regardless of our denominational
affiliation? My general answer to that
question is, "yes." My
non-general answer is, "it depends."
More and more, churches have begun to put statements of faith on their
websites in order to explain the specific things that they believe. Unfortunately, this practice can easily be
transformed into legalistic lists, but I
certainly don't think this is always the case.
It is essential to hold to convictions and to be able to specifically
explain what you believe and why you believe it.
The danger is not falling into the trap of listing everything that you
don't agree with rather than making specific statements of what you do believe.
Some denominations would get
specific by listing the things that they would consider to be essentials and
non-essentials. The Evangelical
Presbyterian Church has as its motto, "In essentials...unity, in
non-essentials...liberty, in all things...charity." This seems to be a fairly good motto to
embrace as long as we distinguish the things that are essential and
non-essential to us. We need to lay
those out, by ourselves, working out our salvation with fear and trembling. If we are unsure, we must search the
Scriptures rather than simply take someone else's word. Belief may involve faith, but it certainly
does not mean blind belief without struggling and wrestling to come up with
answers. Contrary to popular belief, faith can be cerebral.
Do denominations and membership
within them pull us away from the specific mission and purpose of God's
Church? Sadly, I think this is becoming
the case more and more. Instead of
seeking to reach a world who needs to understand and know the love of Jesus Christ,
we bicker and argue and spend significant amounts of time debating things that
should be essential beliefs and trying to convince others of things that are
non-essentials. These conversations are
important, if they are indeed conversations, but we need not let them displace
our true calling to make disciples of all people. If we are to make disciples of all people, we
need to be able to articulate our beliefs, so this gets kind of sticky. It really becomes essential for us to know which
things fall into essentials and which things fall into non-essentials and then
be ready to move on from there, holding loosely to the things which should be held loosely and holding firmly to those which should be held with
firmness.
I'm still wrestling through so
much of this. Membership to a church is
something that is not specifically stated within Scripture, but it is certainly
implied, at least the idea of being a part of God's Church as well as being
held accountable to standards. We cannot
think that we will successfully journey through this life as individuals with
no help or accountability. If we think
that we are capable of being islands, fulfilling all of our own needs, we are
sadly mistaken. Membership is a mad-made
concept while covenant is a God-made concept.
Frankly, membership is a softer notion than a covenant, and we really
should enter into our relationships with covenants, especially our
relationships with the body of Christ on the earth.
I don't claim to hold the corner
on the market with these ideas, but I have continually wrestled with them. Feel free to question my thoughts, there may
be some that I have not thought through as well as others. I hope and pray that I can hold loosely to
things that are non-essentials and yet be firmly convinced of my
convictions. May we all seek to grow
more in wisdom and knowledge, but may we
never lose sight of the fact that wisdom and knowledge without practice is
nothing more than good ideas without any implementation.
Thanks so much for the time and thought put into my questions! It gives me a lot to think about, especially about covenants. I hadn't thought of membership from that angle before.
ReplyDeleteI think I assume that someone declaring him/herself a Christian is already affiliated with a Body of believers, b/c Christianity is relational. To really exercise your faith, you need to associate with others for support and accountability, as you said. For me, that is a given woven into my belief system that would exist (like it does now) without a formal membership in a given church. It's part of my commitment to Christ to love God and love my neighbors. It's why I've never had a problem with James' statement of "faith without works is dead", b/c works is a natural outpouring of my faith. Likewise, associating with a Body of Christ is a natural "side effect" of my faith. God knows my heart, so I have come to feel that declaring a membership publicly is contradicting what Jesus talks in Matthew 6.
1 Corinthians 1 gives me pause, as well, in my struggle over church membership. Christ has united us with God, therefore we should be united with each other if we are One in Christ. Christ's death was our blood covenant, right? Certainly, it's our human tendency to associate with people who worship similarly to us - I see that as the biggest obvious difference in denominations: people who interpret the Bible the same way glom together.
Maybe some people need that outward identifier of membership to be more comfortable in finding like-minded worshipers who will hold them accountable in similar areas? Maybe for some it helps secure their faith, knowing their names are on documents somewhere?
I guess if membership is a man-made tool that helps some to strengthen & practice their faiths, then it is important. If it hinders one's faith through too many earthly legalities, that is when I find it detrimental. I agree that man-made membership in the Body should never distract from God. If we're too busy looking horizontally at man's rules, we don't have time to look vertically to listen to God, follow His rules of love, justice & mercy, & thank Him for His Grace.
Thank you again for being so open to my questions as I struggle with the membership concept. I will definitely be thinking more on your good points.